except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C-III cargo vehicles.

On July 25, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on July 11, 201:40, and proceeded at about 50 km from the intersection to the intersection of the river research institute located in Yongsan-dong of Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon, by two-lanes in front of the shooting distance.

Since there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to live well on the right and the right of the driver of the motor vehicle and to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the front part of the cargo vehicle driven by the Defendant in the front part of the cargo vehicle driven by the victim D(the age of 47) who was driven by the victim D(the age of 47) under the new subparagraph in the direction of the north Daejeon Gac (IC) in the direction of the intersection due to negligence of entering the intersection, disregarding that the vehicle driving signal is a stop signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D, including three cages that require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment of the victim D due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and suffered injury to the F (27 years of age) that requires approximately one week of medical treatment to the said victim F (P) who was a guest of the said damage taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement made to F and D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (Duplicates) Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (i.e., the first offender, the victims and the first agreement).