At around 2005, the Defendant met with the victim V1 (Y, 37 years of age) and the Internet club, which led to the occurrence of the previous wife and fire, and divorced from the previous wife. From July 2007, the Defendant liveded with the victim and the Busan Southern-gu apartment.

1. homicide;

Around 03:30 on August 30, 2008, the Defendant was drinking at the house of the victim of the above apartment, and the victim 51 completed the company and returned home while drinking alcohol, and went out of the house with a means to keep him out of the house. The Defendant: (a) went out of the house for the purpose of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of

After entering the house, the defendant continued to read the above victim as "Isle who was in the currency," but the victim did not answer any question, and the victim thought that I had come to death with another male, due to the garmentment of the victim, and when I am blick with the head of the victim, and the victim 52 (67 years old) who is the mother of the victim 51 who was next in the victim flick, went to the defendant "Isle? Isn't know that Isn's mother is "Isle? Isn's mother who was well known to fl't go? Isn't go to go to the part of the above victim V2, because I am bl't walk."

The Defendant continued to use the face of the victim V1 on a variety of occasions. The Defendant thought that the victim 51 has winded, tried to kill the victims by using it on the floor of the ward. The Defendant, who did not take the face of the victim 51 on a variety of occasions, taken the victim 51 face and body on a variety of occasions, taken a day-type hacker(30cm in length) in the ward, and took a part of the victim 51 face on several occasions, and had the victim knife a knife (30cm in length, about 17cm in length, knife in the kitchen) and knife in the kitchen (17cm in length, knife in the knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife, and knife the knife and knife k.

2. Injury;

At around 04:00 on August 30, 2008, at the same place as the above V1, the Defendant saw that the victim 53 (8 years of age) of the above V1 son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son her head son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son her face of the victim son son

Summary of Evidence

Omission

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Article 250(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of murder, the choice of each limited term) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of injury and the choice of imprisonment)

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes concerning homicide against Victims V1 of the largest Punishment and Punishment)

1. Inclusion of days of detention in detention;

Article 57 of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act is that the victim was divorced from the victim V1 before three years prior to the crime, living together with the above victim, and actually maintained a matrimonial relationship, and the victim V1 was found to have returned to another male and mobile phone at night, and the victim was not aware of the facts, and then the victim was sprinked with her hand and sprink, and the victim was sprinked with her wind, and the victim was sprinked with her mother, and the victim was sprinked with her mother, who was the victim. In this regard, the victim and the above victim were sprinked with 8 years prior to the crime. In particular, the defendant could not be considered favorable to the defendant in light of the motive and circumstances of the crime, and there was no way to spick up his life by taking into account the victim's body and spicking the victim's body as soon as possible.

shall not be sentenced to any one sentence.

However, the defendant has been engaged in his/her occupation so far and has lived in good faith, actually coming to the reduction of his/her responsibility for the crime of killing his/her wife and mother as his/her own hand, and his/her mistake is divided in depth, and all of the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family environment, criminal records, circumstances before the opening, etc., shall be determined like the order, taking into account all of the sentencing conditions.

Judges Cho Jong-tae

Judges Yoon Jin-jin