명예훼손등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is the representative of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council of Residents' Representatives 253 Dong, and the victim D (ma, 45 years old) is the chairman of the apartment management committee.
Around 20:00 on March 12, 2015, during the attendance of 17 representatives and five election management members at the office of the council of occupants' representatives at the above apartment complex, the first meeting of the council of occupants' representatives was in progress, and the incumbent chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives, even though there was an official website of the apartment apartment, has been operating a private Internet camera, and thus, the victim’s opinion related to the election of the council of occupants’ representatives was silented on the ground that he/she had expressed an opinion to request the withdrawal of the above cameras related to the election of the council of occupants’ representatives, and that he/she has raised the victim’s opinion. As he/she has saw spawd, such spawd, such as the Domine and spathe, where a spawd spawd, is anywhere, and the chairperson of the management committee of the Republic of Korea is required to be engaged in a large amount of spawd, and publicly insulting the victim.
B. Defamation 1). The facts of the victim at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph (a) are not the Chairperson of the Election Management Act in order to receive money. However, “The President of the Election Management Office intends to know only his/her own machine with his/her own machine, which he/she is in his/her possession. If the Election Management Commission has an authoritative consciousness and documents with his/her authority, then he/she shall not change.” On March 19, 2015, he/she damages his/her reputation by making a large voice, and (b) around March 20, 2015, at the meeting of the council of occupants' representatives of the above apartment complex, around 17:20 persons were present at the meeting of representatives of the above apartment complex, while the victim was working at the second meeting, the fact of the victim, such as the preceding paragraph, even though he/she did not have a duty to waive his/her duties or demand money, it is obvious that the victim has abandoned his/her duties by combining it in the election management.
d. the amount;