1. The Defendant, at the D church located in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget C around the summer of 2014, is the same as F new pastors.

By stating that “the victim F was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. On August 29, 2014, the Defendant caused I to create a church at H church located in the Chungcheongnam-nam budget group G, “F-led by inciting others.”

F The F's these actions are the same as the acts of celebity.

After a day, I confirmed that there was a name F in the Newcheon Book, according to the fact-finding process, I would like to say that there was a name F in the F.

The term “patently damaged the reputation of the victim F by publicly concluding that the victim F.

3. The Defendant: (a) around April 2015, to May 5, 2015, at K church located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, there is a person who objects to the church assembly; and (b) is F and new.

“The victim F’s reputation was undermined by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;

C. On October 17, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, submission of a written withdrawal of complaint stating that the injured person does not want to be punished against the defendant

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;