except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 18, 2015, the Defendant driven a two-wheeled vehicle of CTS125EV on a 17:35th day of May 17, 2015, while driving the crosswalk in front of the Daejeon Dong-gu along the direction from the direction of the police box of the Dong-dong, Daejeon, carried out as it is in violation of the signal, and caused injury to the victim E (V), who was standing the above crosswalk in accordance with the signal, by occupational negligence, such as the left side of the victim E (V) who was standing the above crosswalk in accordance with the signal of E, E, E, 74 years old, due to the shock of the above two-wheeled vehicle with the front wheels part of the above two-wheeled vehicle for about 10 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

2. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (including persons who have been specially mitigated) of the type 1 of the general traffic accident (including those who have been specially mitigated) / In the case where illegality in the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Special School Act (including those who have committed serious efforts to recover from damage) / In the case where the illegality of the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Special School Act is serious (in violation of the notification of sentence] signal, the degree of injury is very serious, as the victim’s outbreak, etc. are isolated, and the degree of injury is very serious, and the compensation is not sufficiently paid due to the failure to subscribe to a comprehensive insurance.

However, considering the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all mistakes and reflecteds, the fact that the defendant was subscribed to liability insurance, the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim, and the first offender who has no punishment power, etc.