Defendant

B The school juristic person is a juristic person established for the purpose of providing specialized education concerning secondary education, and Defendant A, from September 7, 2004 to August 31, 2013, was the principal of the D High School affiliated with the school juristic person B in Jinju City, taking overall charge of the administration and school affairs of the above high school.

1. Notwithstanding that the attached parking lot of Defendant A’s building cannot be used for purposes other than the parking lot, the Defendant, around October 24, 201, performed construction works of external teams and steel structure on the attached parking lot (221.92 square meters, approximately 67 square meters) with the first floor of the relevant high school dormitory, and used the attached parking lot for purposes other than the parking lot from the above temporary point to September 201, using the attached parking lot of the high school D High School from the above temporary point to the end of September 2014 as a golf practice range.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, used attached parking lots for purposes other than parking lots in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, minutes of a H school sports subcommittee, internal settlement reports on the conclusion of a contract to build a golf practice range, specifications for completion inspection, charges for the installation of a panel of D and D driving practice ranges (goods), each disbursement decision letter, all the registered matters, certificates (B), photographs used by a golf practice range, restoration photographs, interview reports, interview reports (D and assistant principal I interviews), and investigation reports (attached to a written decision on the construction cost of a golf practice range);

1. Article 29 (1) 2 of the Parking Lot Act, and Article 19-4 (1) (Selection of Fines) and Article 19-4 (1) (B): Articles 31, 29 (1) 2, and 19-4 (1) of the Parking Lot Act;

1. Sentence Defendants: Fines of three million won for each of them;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (the period converted into one day);

1. Defendants: Suspension of sentence: