폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
[Defendant A] One year of imprisonment with prison labor, and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime No. 2 and No. 3 of the judgment, respectively, as to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of Defendant A.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] Defendant A and B were sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Busan District Court on December 17, 2015, and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on December 25, 2015.
Defendant
C was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for similar rape, etc. by the Busan High Court on January 25, 2017, and the judgment was finalized on April 11, 2017. On September 23, 2016, Defendant D was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for similar rape, etc. by the Busan District Court on September 23, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 11, 2017.
[Criminal facts]
1. 2016 Gohap 677 ( Defendants)
A. On August 29, 2015, Defendants A and B received a handphone message to the effect that around 12:50 on August 29, 2015, the Defendant was arrested and detained by Defendant A and Defendant B, and that △△△△△ was detained in Busan Northern EcomF, and Defendant A and Defendant B got off the head of the victim D (24 m in length) who was divingd in the said telecom with a dangerous object prior to the search for the said telecom, and got off the victim’s head of the said telecom (24 m in length) for about six weeks of medical treatment.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to inflict bodily injury on the victim by carrying dangerous objects.
2) At the time, place, etc. stated in Paragraph 1-A, the Defendants stolen the instant 3 mobile phones owned by the victim Samsung Tallon during the instant gallon (market price equivalent to KRW 2.50,000) with 3 mobile phones owned by the victim D.
As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.
B. In around 08:00 on August 29, 2015, the Defendant, at the mar room in Busanbuk-gu Geldo, Busan, on the pretext of arranging sexual traffic, the Defendant was going to the above marel and showed the Defendant’s correspondence to the victim (here, 17 years of age) who is a child or juvenile, and continued to “in order to engage in sexual traffic, the Defendant shall have an interview as to whether the sexual relationship is well and have an interview.
It is not possible to send it without any day, and it is dead upon the escape of the person.
“The victim threatened,” and at the same time, the victim’s voice and resistance.