사기등
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the judgment of the court below which acquitted all of the charges of this case, despite the fact that each of the charges of this case was fully convicted, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.
2. The court below determined that each of the facts charged in this case constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the prosecutor
subsection (b) of this section.
3. The appeal against the Defendants by the prosecutor of the conclusion is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act and is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure; however, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the “victim M” of the judgment of the court below as “victim N”, “Defendant N” of the 5th page “M” as “victim N”, “Excus related” of the 8th page “Excus related”, “1,50 dollars” of the 5th page “15,00 dollars” and “1,700 dollars” of the 6th page “17,00 USD 17,00” are corrected as “17,00 each official authority”).