When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant was engaged in the Internet computer game facility industry from Daegu Seo-gu B and the first floor with CPC trade name.

An Internet computer game facility producer shall not provide, exhibit or store game products for the distribution or use of contents different from those classified by a meeting of the rating members for the game products.

Nevertheless, during the period from early May 2016 to July 17:40, 2016, a game machine charging method, which was classified as the class in the above room, consists of indirect method (such as a prior card). However, the Defendant provided a game product that differs from the classification by opening or altering a game program against an unspecified customer by installing a game “Switzerland” in the PC. However, the Defendant provided a game product that is different from the classification by using a manager, who is different from the classification by opening or altering the game program against an unspecified customer, by receiving cash from the customer, such as: (a) providing a game product that is different from the classification by using a game product; and (b) charging 10,000 points per 10,000 points per 10,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Reports on internal investigation and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing investigation reports;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry (Selection of Penalty) concerning the punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;