beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.05 2017가합566087

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 299,112,803 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 43,436,903 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 43,436,903 to Plaintiff B, from the D date to December 2, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The defendant is the Furrician in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E (hereinafter “the instant hospital”).

(2) The plaintiff B is a mother with the natural delivery experience of three times (198, 2000, 2001) and who gives birth to the plaintiff A, a child, at the hospital of this case on the D date with the defendant as follows:

B. (1) Prior to the time when Plaintiff B entered the instant hospital, after receiving a cryptic diagnosis from Gsanbu and undergoing a cryptic diagnosis at the said hospital. On July 3, 2012, the blood test conducted at the said hospital showed symptoms of eromomobin, such as that the blood crymin value was considerably lower than 11-16g/dL, referenced values, and that was found to have been considerably lower than 11.5g/dL. On August 11, 2012, the result of the 50g party lower examination conducted at the said hospital (50g party crypt 294g/dL, reference values of which were considerably higher than 70-140g/d) and the Plaintiff B did not perform the said cryptic cryptic cryptic 2010g party 20g party 20gg party 200gg party g party.

C. The Plaintiff B was first admitted to the instant hospital on October 8, 2012, which was pregnant 35 parking, and the Plaintiff B first admitted to the instant hospital (the weight of Plaintiff B was 7.7km at that time) (the weight of Plaintiff B was 7.7km).

The State informed the Defendant of the blood test result conducted with Gsanbu and the test result of the propriety of 50g.

Accordingly, the defendant diagnosed the plaintiff B with an empty urology, and explained the possibility of treating the plaintiff B in the event that the plaintiff B continues to have an empty urology, and the risk of a pregnant urology. At the time, the plaintiff B knew that her is pregnant urology, and the plaintiff B knew that her is pregnant urology and adjusted her pregnancy urology.

In addition, the defendant on the same day, the fetus first-wave test and blood test for the plaintiff B.