A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We also examine the judgment and prosecutor’s arguments.

The fact that the defendant fully acknowledges the crime of this case, that there was no harm to human life due to the crime of this case, and that the defendant shows symptoms and depressions, that there was no history of criminal punishment in Korea, that there was no history of criminal punishment in Korea, and that the defendant's family want to take a preference against the defendant, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

한편, 이 사건 범행은 피고인이 적법한 운전면허 없이 술에 취한 상태에서 자동차를 운전하여 피해자 넥슨코리아 주식회사의 건물 앞까지 간 후 위험한 물건인 자동차로 위 건물에 그대로 돌진하여 건물 1층 유리창을 뚫고 건물 내부까지 들어간 것으로서 그 죄질이 상당히 좋지 않은 점, 피고인은 자신의 처지를 비관한 나머지 그 책임을 남에게 전가하는 비뚤어진 생각에 이 사건 범행을 저질렀고, 그로 인하여 발생된 사회적 위험도 상당한 점, 이 사건 특수재물손괴 범행으로 인하여 피해자 회사가 입은 피해액이 2,000만 원이 넘음에도 아직까지 제대로 된 피해 보상이 이루어지지 않은 점 등은 피고인에게 불리한 정상이다.

Considering such overall circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed to be too weak or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.