2. In light of other factors of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is deemed appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit, since it is recognized that the sentence of the lower court is appropriate in light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant had the record of being punished for the same crime; (b) the Defendant committed the crime of this case without being committed during the period of suspension of execution due to obstruction of performance of official duties; and (c) the Defendant did not take any practical measures to recover damage

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.