When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 9. 28. 11:30 경 이혼한 처의 모친인 피해자 B( 여, 67세) 와 전화 통화를 하다가 피해자가 욕설을 하였다는 이유로 말다툼을 한 후 위 피해자의 아들인 피해자 C(44 세) 이 전화로 피고인에게 “ 너 이 새끼 이리 와! ”라고 말하자, 피해자들이 거주하는 이천시 D 아파트 #### 호에 찾아가 출입문을 열고 거실 안으로 들어가게 되었다.

The defendant did not leave despite the demand of the victim C to leave the apartment living room in the above apartment house, but did not leave the room, and carried the victim C's dub, and pushed down the chest on hand.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with the request to leave the residence of the victims without any justifiable reason, and assault C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 319(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (in response to the refusal of eviction), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.