배당이의
1. The Plaintiff among the distribution schedule prepared by the said court on December 27, 2013 with respect to the distribution procedure B case of the Daegu District Court.
1. Basic facts
A. 1) Dividend Payment Claim for the Republic of Korea of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant association”) and Ethreshion reconstruction association (hereinafter “instant association”).
On March 8, 2011, the instant union drafted a notarial deed for debt repayment contract No. 269 of the Fjoint law office 201 that the notary public bears the obligation for construction cost of KRW 280,000,000 to D. D. As the title of the said notarial deed, D applied for a compulsory auction of real estate on the land outside Daegu-gu, Daegu District Court, 1722 square meters, the ownership of the instant association, and the said court rendered a decision to commence compulsory auction on March 29, 201 (I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, V, overlap, and hereinafter referred to as “instant auction procedure”).
On May 23, 2011, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 9-1, 2.2) X prepared a notarial deed of debt repayment contract No. 550 of the 201-gu General Law Office 201 with the purport that the instant association bears the obligation of the reconstruction association expense of KRW 450,000 to X between the instant association and the notary public, who prepared a notarial deed of debt repayment contract No. 550 of the 201-gu General Law Office, and X applied for a report of right and demand for distribution on June 1, 2011 based on the said notarial deed in the instant auction procedure.
(A) Evidence No. 1 and Evidence No. 9-3) C Co., Ltd. (Y Co., Ltd. to C Co., Ltd. on December 12, 2011;
hereinafter referred to as "C".
On May 26, 2011, the instant union prepared a deed of debt repayment contract No. 581 of the 201-gu General Law Office No. 201 with the effect that the instant union bears the debt of KRW 464 million to C, and X, the representative director of C, filed an application for a report of right and a demand for distribution on June 7, 201 based on the said deed at the instant auction procedure (Evidence No. 1 and No. 9-4). On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the instant union and the instant union for damages claim against the Daegu District Court 2009Gahap5466, Jul. 13, 2011.