A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Defendant

A From November 15, 2011, a business owner operating sexual traffic establishments in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the trade name "D key store" from Mapo-gu, and Defendant B is a person who worked as the head of the business office of the above establishment from January 2013.

The Defendants conspired to engage in arranging commercial sex acts by receiving the price for sexual traffic from the male grandchildren who found in the above business place, and by having sexual intercourse with the female employees of the above business place.

Accordingly, on April 10, 2014, the Defendants received 2,760,000 won from E, F to pay 70,000 won for sexual traffic as the price for alcoholic beverages and sex acts, and promised to pay 350,000 won for female employees G and H, respectively, among which the Defendants agreed to pay 70,000 won for sexual traffic to the said female descendants and female employees to “Jel” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, and around 00:30 on April 10, 2014, in the above 10:30,000 Moel 103, the Defendants made it possible for female employees to cover the sexual intercourse with F, and made them pay for sexual traffic to the said female employees from the above Moel 104.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning G, H, E, or F;

1. Copy of the business license or business registration certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of the drinking value value receipt, telegraphs, red Seas, and business books and photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Defendant B who has chosen to imprisonment with prison labor: Selection of fine;

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment (the scope of recommendations) are as follows: Defendant A [the scope of recommendations] is based on the type of sexual traffic crime subject to 19 years of age or older, the brokerage of commercial sex trafficking, etc.;