However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. In light of the fact that around 2017, the Defendant: (a) was kept in custody in front of the cargo vehicle B operated by the Defendant in arrears; (b) was willing to forge the vehicle number plate for the purpose of continuing operation of the said vehicle; (c) had the signboard producer produce the “B” number plate using green plastic plates and white films; and (d) had the signboard producer produce the number plate for the purpose of continuing operation of the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a car registration number plate, which is a mark of public office, for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. The Defendant, at around 2017, operated a forged car registration number plate as described in paragraph 1, after attaching it to the front number plate of the freight vehicle and attaching it to the front number plate of the freight vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised a motor vehicle registration number plate, which is the mark of a forged public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on report on the occurrence of a sign;

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 238 of the Official Code), Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of exercising forged air defense);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the court recognizes a mistake and the fact that there is no previous conviction in the same kind) in the suspension of execution;