2. We examine the judgment, the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the fact that part of the amount of damage has been repaid is favorable grounds for sentencing, and the fact that the total defraudation against the victims amounting to approximately KRW 113 million, not agreed with the victims, the fact that the victims did not agree with the victims, and that the same criminal record was two times, and in particular, the crime was committed during the period of repeated crimes of the same kind.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the crime, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment below’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.