손해배상(기)
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
(1) Defendant C is entitled to KRW 1,500,000, and as regards this, Defendant C is entitled to KRW 1,500.
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions such as deletion or dismissal, and therefore, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts that are deleted or changed;
A. The judgment of the court of first instance on the deletion
2. Determination
B. Of the scope of compensation for damages, the part of “(1) medical expenses, injury diagnosis expenses, and lost profit” (No. 8. 16 lines) shall be deleted.
B. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance (2) to the 10th above 4th above shall be written in the following cases.
According to the above facts, it is reasonable to view that the plaintiff suffered emotional distress due to each tort described in Article 1-2 (b) of the defendants' 1-2. Thus, the defendants are obligated to do so in money to the plaintiff. In light of the circumstances of the above case, the contents of the defendants' tort, its causes and progress, the extent of the plaintiff's damage, the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants, the status within the J organization, the relationship between the defendants and the defendants, and the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants, the amount of consolation money to be paid to the plaintiff shall be determined as follows. (A) The defendant C: 1.5 million won (B) and the defendant B: 1.0 million won (However, the consolation money of 5 million won due to joint coercion on November 16, 2012 shall be paid in collaboration with the remaining defendants.
(C) Defendant D: KRW 700,000 (Provided, That the consolation money of KRW 500,000 due to joint coercion on November 16, 2012 shall be paid in collaboration with the remaining Defendants.
A person shall be appointed.
C. Accordingly, in accordance with the theory of litigation, the Plaintiff is a solatium for tort; Defendant C is a solatium for tort; Defendant C is a KRW 1.5 million; Defendant B is jointly with Defendant C, KRW 500,000 among the above money; Defendant D is a delivery day of each copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff after the date of each tort; Defendant C is from March 19, 2016; and Defendant B is a delivery day of each copy of the complaint of this case, which was sought by the Plaintiff with respect to each of the above money.