However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

The Defendants of the 2016 Highest 703, who were on the street and became aware of the street, offered money to be raised by putting off the vehicle that has not been corrected.

Accordingly, at around 02:50 on January 30, 2016, the Defendants reported the network of Defendant B in front of the child care center located in Kimhae-si, and Defendant A attempted to open and open each door of the G Mart car owned by the victim F, H-owned I, K-owned I, and K-owned K-U-U-owned, but the vehicle door was set off without opening any door.

Defendant B continuously reported the network, and Defendant A opened a door of a vehicle owned by the victim L, which was parked in the above location, which was not corrected in the vehicle, and colored a stolen object, but did not discover stolen objects and attempted.

As a result, the Defendants jointly attempted to steal another's property.

On August 15, 2011, Defendant A, at around 00:00 on August 15, 201, infringed upon the structure managed by the victim, entering the school room through open windows in mind and on the mind that the victim H, located in Ulsan-gun N, Ulsan-gun, was occupied and managed by the victim He.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 703"

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. "P, H, J, L) 2016 Height 1151";

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A written statement (H);

1. On-site forest land, and on-site photographs;

1. Application of the statutes on the response data requested for appraisal;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and each special larceny committed by the Defendants who choose a punishment: Violation of the structure of Defendant A under Articles 342, 331(2), and 331(1) of the Criminal Act: Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment)

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act No. 1.