beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.10.23 2013구합2891

직업훈련비 반환 및 추가징수 처분 등 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates C Child-Care Center B in Chungcheongnam-do, Jeonnam-do.

나. 직업능력개발훈련의 실시 원고는 위탁교육업체인 챌린지러닝코리아 주식회사 및 브레인러닝코리아 주식회사(아래에서는 ‘이 사건 각 훈련기관’이라 한다)로부터 훈련비용의 부담 없이 직업능력개발훈련을 받을 수 있다는 제안을 받고서, 이 사건 각 훈련기관과 인터넷원격훈련의 방식으로 이루어지는 직업능력개발훈련 위탁계약을 체결하고 2010. 7. 14.부터 2011. 10. 7.까지 별지1 표 기재와 같은 내용으로 인터넷원격훈련을 실시하였다.

C. On February 27, 2013, the Gwangju Metropolitan Police Agency notified the Defendant of the investigation results that “The instant training institution made a full advance payment of training expenses to the business owner, and made a business owner deposit the training expenses again to the instant training institution, and received subsidies from the business owner after completing the training as if the training expenses were normally paid, and then made a false transaction of training expenses with the business owner and receiving subsidies from the business owner.”

Based on the investigation results of the Gwangju Regional Police Agency and the defendant's investigation results, on August 26, 2013, the defendant submitted false evidentiary documents of training expenses as if the plaintiff applied for training expenses even if the plaintiff received training expenses from each training institution of this case and did not fully bear the actual training expenses, and submitted false evidentiary documents of training expenses to the defendant, and ② submitted a certificate of completion issued falsely for the use of forced completion skills to illegally receive subsidies of KRW 7,763,50, and received subsidies from the plaintiff.