When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 1, 2016, at around 00:05, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim’s UAAD taxi in front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) was rejected by the Defendant: (c) reported the victim’s UAAD taxi in front of Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and (d) rejected, thereby damaging the victim’s 313,50 won for repairing the said taxi by unloading the back glass of the said taxi once as drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Photographs, etc. of damaged vehicles;

1. Investigation report (attached a photograph of the damaged vehicle and written estimate);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Selection of Penalty concerning the Crime. Article 366 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;