공상(재해부상)군경요건비해당결정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
The reasoning of the judgment of this court, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows: (a) the "this court" in the 6th, 8th, 16th, 11th, 17th, 6th, 6th, 6th, and 17 of the grounds of appeal of the court of first instance; (b) the "witnessnessness" in the 10th, 15th, shall be read as the "witnessness witness of the court of first instance"; and (c) the judgment on the plaintiff's argument at the court of first instance is identical to the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition of the judgment as described in paragraph (2) below; and
The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff, prior to the occurrence of the instant wound, Belgium was suffering due to overwork and stress, and that the instant wound was caused due to the post-labelation of Belgium.
However, even if it is assumed that Belgium incurred prior to the instant injury, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, including partial testimony by the witness C of the first instance trial and partial description of Gap evidence No. 4, is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff had an overwork and stress on the content and degree of each cause of Belgium or the instant injury.
In addition, the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone was a separate disease separate from the instant wound before the instant wound occurred to the Plaintiff, and it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff again caused the instant wound.
(B) According to the statement in Eul evidence No. 9 in relation to this, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit, contrary to the progress of the plaintiff's assertion, that there is a euthanasia due to a testamentary gift of the anti-feasopic feas. Thus, it is not deemed that the euthanasia and the anti-feopic fecopic fecopic feas are sufficiently established
If so, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.