[criminal records] On July 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and three months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Jeonju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 6, 2013.

[2] The Defendant, in collusion with either alone or in society, committed an intentional accident with respect to vehicles that change their course in a white-style place, vehicles that enter the route from a cattle, etc. with a high rate of negligence in the event of an accident, such as vehicles that enter the road, and vehicles that enter the road, etc., and received the large-scale and large-scale insurance money from the insurance company and acquired it by fraud.

1. Fraud;

A. On July 18, 2013, around 23:45, the Defendant solely committed the Defendant’s crime, while driving the vehicle in front of the National Bank of the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City National Bank, and driving the vehicle in front of the vehicle involved in the intentional accident, and driving the FM5 vehicle in the way from three lanes to two lanes in the same direction while discovering the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the said small vehicle, without reducing the speed, and driving the vehicle in front of the FM5 vehicle in front of the said small vehicle.

On the same day, the Defendant: (a) caused a victim (owner) who purchased the said SM5 vehicle to receive an accident in the accident insurance on the same day, and (b) received the total sum of 1,131,940 won from the victim, on the same day, on the same day as the accident occurred, even though the Defendant intentionally caused the accident; and (c) received delivery from the victim of the accident.

From the same date to May 6, 2015, the Defendant, by means of the same method, obtained a total of 26,839,930 won from the victim insurance companies under the name of the victim, such as 26,839,930 won, directly delivered from the victim insurance companies or let a third party receive the same, under the name of the victim, for example, 1 to 4, 18, and 19 of the list of crimes in attached Table 18, and 19.

The court may, to the extent that the identity of the facts charged is recognized, put a substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right of defense.