If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

On July 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for the crime of interference with business, etc. in Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on four occasions. On October 18, 2012, and February 27, 2013, the Defendant filed for a summary order for the same crime as the above support, and each of the summary orders was issued.

1. On March 22, 2013, from around 18:25 to 18:40 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force of approximately 15 minutes, such as spiting the victim’s “D’s operation” restaurant located in Ansan-si B, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, in which the Defendant 18:40 on the same day, in which the Defendant spits, spits theme on the table, cutting the table on the table, cutting the table, and taking a bath for the victim who demanded the payment of the meal, and cutting the cell phone on his/her hand, without any reason.

2. From around 22:00 on March 22, 2013 to 01:25 of the following day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main store business by force between around 3:00 to 25:0, at the main point of “G” in the management of the victim F of the fourth E of Ansan-si E 4th floor in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, without any justifiable reason, sound, shouldering the beer’s disease on the floor, exposing the beer’s disease on the floor, and displaying the beer’s vision to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. A H statement;

1. Each photograph and each investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc., references to dispositions, dispositions, dispositions, and reporting results;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are several cases of the defendant. Moreover, each of the crimes of this case has been repeatedly committed during the period of suspended execution due to this previous case, and each of the crimes of this case is very heavy in light of the method and result, and no agreement has been reached with the victim F.