1. On September 9, 2014, around 05:35, the Defendant injured the victim E (the age of 18) who passed his/her seat in front of the D convenience point in Ma-si, Ma-si, on one occasion, on the ground that he/she had seen the victim’s her eye at one time, and caused the victim’s injury on the part of the victim when he/she returned to the right side by drinking on the left side of the ship, and again caused the victim’s injury on the closed fright so that he/she needs to receive approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, at around 05:44 on September 9, 2014, assaulted the victim F (18 years of age) who was the first executive of the above E on the ground that the victim F (18 years of age) expresses himself/herself at the place indicated in paragraph (1) and who was off the victim’s left side at one time, and was off the victim’s face one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions and police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Other damaged photographs and CCTV analysis photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. From among concurrent crimes, a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor is inevitable when considering the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes is deemed to have led to confessions and reflects of each of the crimes of this case; and (b) the fact that there is no same criminal record; (c) the degree of injury and injury in light of each of the crimes of this case and the degree of damage; and (d) the victims did not agree with the victims; and (e) the victims want to punish the defendants: Provided, That the decision is made as ordered by taking into account the favorable circumstances above and various circumstances shown in the records, such as the defendant’