Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100.

Defendant

A As the representative of B, a person in charge of safety and health affairs in the workplace, and Defendant B, a corporation established for the purpose of Internet services, etc., is a business owner who installs, maintains and repairs the Internet on a house, apartment house, etc. with at least 68 full time workers

1. Although Defendant A’s business owner pays protective outfits in compliance with the working conditions, such as allowing employees to wear safety caps, etc. in cases where the object falls or is likely to fall or fall, the Defendant did not pay protective outfits, safety shoes, safety belts, etc. in compliance with the necessary working conditions around September 2013 to employees C and one other employed around September 2013.

2. The Defendant Company B did not comply with the safety and health measures necessary for the safety and health under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, as stated in paragraph (1) of the Defendant’s representative director A.

Summary of Evidence

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Each police statement of C (including the cross-examination part);

1. Application of each relevant statute;

1. Article 67 subparagraph 1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and Article 23 (3) of the same Act (Selection of Fines): Defendant B stock company: Articles 71, 67 subparagraph 1, and 23 (3) of the same Act;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;