The Defendant, around November 26, 2015, 2015, 7870, wanting to commit a crime while under the influence of alcohol on the road in front of the Busan Mapopopo-ro 84, Busan Mapo-ro 2, Busan Mopo-ro around November 26, 2015.

I think, about 15 cm in length, the entrance door of the Public Security Center was set up three times every year, and damaged the glass entrance of 250,000 won at the market price.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

On November 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 23:00 on November 25, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was under the influence of alcohol on the back seat of the Victim B (52 tax) located in the Gupo-dong located in Busan Northern-dong; and (c) was deemed to have operated on a different path when the Defendant passed around a bus terminal located in the Seopo-dong, Busan-gu, Seopo-gu, Busan, Busan, the destination of which was a destination; and (d) said, around 23:20 on the same day, the Defendant said that the Defendant was operating on a different path when he was under the influence of alcohol on the back seat of the Kapo-dong located in the Gupo-dong, Seopo-gu, Busan, Busan, the Defendant expressed the victim’s her bath as “the opening.”

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted a driver of a vehicle in operation.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 7870"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Photographs of damage scene;

1. A receipt for repair of an entrance "2015 Height 8539";

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Statement of the police statement in B against the defendant (the defendant was living together and had B go to prison in return for receiving 30,000 won in return for receiving 30,000 won from the defendant;

It argues that only the statement was requested and there is no time to write B.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated, namely, ① Police’s statements and court statements are generally consistent and specific, and are thus credibility; ② Defendant’s statements are insufficient to believe that they are inconsistent, thereby making false statements.

As it is difficult to see, the above argument by the defendant cannot be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;