강제추행
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the prosecutor's appeal (e.g., the crime of this case) is that the defendant committed the crime of this case by force by force by force by force of the victim's chests, who sit in front of the elbows from bus to the elbows, in light of the fact that it is not good that the crime of this case was committed by force by force of the victim by force by force, the damage was not caused, the victim was punished, and the defendant committed the same crime around 201, and there was a history of the defendant's decision that he did not have the right of prosecution because he did not want the punishment of the defendant. In light of the above, the court below's sentence ordering the defendant to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 3 million won and 40 hours, is too un
2. In light of the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s personality and conduct, environment, and family relationship, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, and thus, is not determined unreasonable, since the Defendant was charged for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Place) and was decided by the Hong Branch Office of the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office on March 31, 2011.
3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.