When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 03:20 on November 1, 2018, the Defendant committed assault, such as when the victim D (the age of 24) who is a security guard of the above hospital enter the brine while the victim’s brine b was suffering from the brine of the brine while the victim’s brue b was hicked, and the brue that was over the Defendant’s part was brue, when the victim’s face was taken by hand, and when the brue brue b was taken by hand, the victim’s chest was flue of the victim’s chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The photograph (the counsel claimed to the effect that the defendant requested that the defendant be sent at the emergency room of a hospital, only sent the chest of the nearest victim only once, and that there was no assault against the victim as stated in the judgment. However, in light of the victim's statement in the investigation agency, etc., the fact that the victim was assaulted can be sufficiently recognized as recorded in the judgment of the defendant, and such act of the defendant does not violate social norms, and it is also difficult to view that the act of the defendant constitutes a justifiable act.).

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;