However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a user who operates a consulting service provider related to real estate development by making four full-time workers in the trade name in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Section D.

From May 8, 2006 to June 18, 2013, the Defendant did not pay the wages of 236,930 won for July 2012, the wages of 776,60 won for August, 200, the wages of 1,276,600 won for September, the wages of 776,60 won for October, the wages of 276,60 won for December, the wages of 276,60 won for December, the wages of 2776,60 won for January, the wages of 2,775,280 won for January 2, 2013, the wages of 2,223,570 won for February, the wages of 2,775,280 won for March, the wages of 2,775,280 won for April, the wages of 2,634,510 won for May 27, 2007, the wages of 3638130.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on delayed payment of wages;

1. Article 109 (1) of the Labor Standards Act and the main sentence of Article 36 of the same Act concerning criminal facts, Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act and Article 9 of the same Act concerning the payment of retirement allowances;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;