특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the gist of the grounds of appeal, such as the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victims, the defendant does not drive under influence again, and the defendant is in a position to support his or her child who is divorced with his or her wife and is living alone, the punishment sentenced by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case also requires a strict punishment in accordance with the purport of the Road Traffic Act as well as driving under influence of alcohol by the Defendant while driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license under the influence of alcohol at a level of 0.301%, where it is difficult for him to drive the motor vehicle without a driver's license, and allowing the victim H to shock the motor vehicle in the signal waiting in the front bank in the future, and thereby causing approximately three weeks to the victim F, and approximately two weeks to the victim H, which are in the atmosphere signal in the front bank, to suffer injury requiring a two-way treatment. Such a case is not easy, and driving under the influence of alcohol again requires a strict punishment in accordance with the purport of the Road Traffic Act as amended. In addition, the Defendant again was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at least 0% for driving under the influence of alcohol or for multiple times under the influence of alcohol without a driver's license, and the Defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at least 20% for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to 20.6.1.6%).