On September 29, 2014, the Plaintiff, who misrepresented the staff of the public prosecutor’s office, entered the Plaintiff’s financial information, such as the account number and password, by accessing the website of the lower public prosecutor’s office as it is necessary to strengthen security as he/she is used for a crime, such as lending a loan under the Plaintiff’s name.

On September 29, 2014, the name-based person, without the Plaintiff’s consent, transferred the amount indicated in the “transfer amount” column from the national bank under the Plaintiff’s name to the account in the name of the Defendants in the following table to the financial information entered by the Plaintiff.

After that, the Plaintiff was refunded the amount indicated in the “amount refunded” column in the following table from the account opened in the name of the Defendants.

Since Defendant B-6,20,00 206,310 5,993,690 2,000 1,046,542,542 5,653,458 300 201,99,000 5,999,000 5,999,200 46,000 6,013,2005,205,4925,957,7085 6,020,027,7027,000 6,000,70,700,700 6,00,000,000 or 6,000,000 or 6,000,00,000 or more of Defendant B-6,03, 6,005, 205, 301, 306,2014 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The term "amount claimed" in the statement in paragraph (1) shall be liable for damages.

Judgment

According to the above facts of recognition as to Defendant B, E, and G, the Plaintiff.