beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.27 2014나63741

양수금

Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. According to the statement No. 1 to No. 6 (including D. 2) of the plaintiff and the intervenor's claim Gap 1 to No. 2. 28, Jun. 26, 1995, the Japanese bank lent 13.5% per annum to the plaintiff 2, Jun. 26, 1998, and damages for delay to the plaintiff 2, 30,000 won per annum 18% per annum, and the defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the debt to the Japanese bank Eul. The Japanese Bank transferred the debt to the defendant 2, 30% per annum to the defendant 2, 200, 200, 300 won per annum from the above 2, 40,000 won per annum to the plaintiff 2, 30,000 won per annum, and the plaintiff 2, 204, 206, 30,000 won per annum 2,000 won per annum to the plaintiff 2, 4206,29.