Seized evidence 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

On March 4, 2017, the Defendant was well aware of the fact that from the 51-lane 69-gil, Kimpo-dong, Kimpo-dong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 22:25 to the 5-km road in front of the Kimpo-dong, Kimpo-dong, Kimpo-dong, the Defendant was operating a vehicle with the Defendant’s Cirsle-om Patom, which was not covered by the automobile mandatory insurance at approximately 5km in front of the Kimpo-si located in the same city.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance, and at the same time used a motor vehicle number plate unlawfully.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Registers of vehicles (List 13), and inquiries into mandatory insurance (List 14);

1. Photographs (list 6);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraph 1 of this Article;

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the relevant Act on the Management of Motor Vehicles, Article 71 (1) (Unlawful Use of Number plates), Article 46 (2) 2, and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The crime of this case was once again committed under the conditions favorable to the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, and under the conditions unfavorable to the defendant (a confession) and under the unfavorable circumstances (a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime committed during the period of suspension of execution for the seven to eight months prior to the occurrence of the crime). In light of the very pleasure of the nature of the crime, the content and attitude of the statement at the investigative agency and this court, it is probable that the crime of this case is committed again in the same or similar crime.

The sentencing factors in this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, living environment, means and result, shall be considered together and the sentence shall be determined as ordered.