beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.23 2014노417

사서명위조등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for six months.

2. The judgment of the court below, even though the defendant had been punished for the violation of the Road Traffic Act due to the act of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, tried to actively refrain from liability for the instant crime by using a driver’s license in the form of denying the driver’s license in G name or forging the signature, etc. The judgment of the court below was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on October 11, 2013 due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (driving Vehicles), the accident-free measures after accident, and the violation of the Road Traffic Act due to the drunk driving, which became final and conclusive on January 11, 2013, which committed the instant crime, and there are no change of circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the sentence

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.