2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is the owner who acquired ownership by winning a successful bid in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-Support E compulsory auction case for real estate with the value of 704m2 and 2436m2 (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si.

나. 이 사건 각 토지 중 별지 감정도 도면 표시 41, 6, 43 내지 48, 32 내지 35, 49, 50, 51, 38, 39, 52 내지 55, 14, 56, 10, 57, 7, 42, 41의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (가) 부분 1643㎡{이하 ‘이 사건 (가) 부분 토지’라 한다} 지상 같은 도면 기재 ㄱ ~ ㄹ¹ 부분에 18기의 분묘가 설치되어 있다

(hereinafter referred to as "the 18th grave" shall be referred to as "the 18th grave", and each grave shall be referred to as "the 18th grave".

피고는 이 사건 각 토지의 전 소유자이고, 고조부 F의 묘소인 이 사건 ㅁ분묘와 증조부 G의 묘소인 이 사건 ㄴ¹분묘의 제사주재자 겸 관리처분권자이다.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 and 2, Gap evidence 7, Gap evidence 7, the result of the appraisal commission to the Korea Land Information Corporation Kimcheon branch of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion of this case was owned by the defendant as a clan grave. Since the defendant installed the 18th grave on each of the land of this case owned by the plaintiff and occupied it illegally until now, the defendant has a duty to excavate the 18th grave and deliver the part of the land of this case to the plaintiff.

3. 본안전항변에 대한 판단 피고는, 이 사건 ㅁ, ㄴ¹분묘 외의 나머지 분묘는 피고가 관리하지 않는 분묘이고, 이에 대해 피고가 당사자적격이 없으므로, 부적법하다는 취지로 항변한다.

In the lawsuit for performance, the plaintiff has the standing to be the defendant in the lawsuit for performance, so there is no standing to be the defendant.