In light of the fact that a victim B crossing the road (hereinafter “victim”) suffered injury requiring medical treatment between approximately 12 weeks, and that the defendant did not agree with the victim, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below (two years of suspended execution in six months of imprisonment, two years of probation, and two hundred hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. Even if considering the above circumstances alleged by the Prosecutor, the Defendant reflects the Defendant’s mistake in depth, the Defendant is a primary offender with no criminal power, and the Defendant’s negligence was the cause of an accident caused by an accident that occurred while the victim crossed a three-lane road at the same time. In full view of all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s character, conduct and environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions as indicated in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable, and the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.