beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.26 2016고정381

업무방해

Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by each fine of KRW 500,000,000,00,000,00 for each fine of KRW 1,000.

Defendant

A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the occupants who resided or resided in the Young-gu K Apartment-gu, Young-gu, and are opposing to the construction of the research institute in the Young-gu, Young-gu, the surrounding apartment in the case of the damage company (State).

At around 05:00 on May 26, 2015, N observed that the parts employed by the victimized company during the entrance of the construction site of the said new research institute were trying to carry out the brupt construction, and it was known to the residents of the “the construction was commenced” through a scacker installed by each unit of the above K apartment through the broadcasting facilities installed in the management office after contact with theO.

Accordingly, the number of occupants of the above apartment house including the defendants was collected at the entrance of the above construction site.

At the same time, 30 or more employees employed by the victimized company set up safety fences to prevent the outside person from having access, and 10 or more employees engaged in the pents work inside the above pents.

Accordingly, the Defendants appeared to have been on the front of the safety pents with N and nameless apartment residents, and they had been removed by breaking the pents to enter the construction site, and the above pents have been cut off by breaking the pents to the pents, and the pents have continued to be cut off by the strings, and the strings have been cut off by the strings, and the Defendants and the above apartment residents have been pushed off by force, the strings and the strings of the joint principal offender's actions, and the fact that the Defendants had entered the construction site with the temporary pents and the strings and the strings of the joint principal offender's actions alone interfered with the construction work by force. Thus, the Defendants took off the electric strings that Defendant I had been working for the strings.

“The part” was deleted ex officio because there is a lack of proof of the fact that the seed was deducted. It entered the construction site above.

As a result, the defendants are 200 or more apartment residents in N and nameless apartment.