도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. Around 01:20 on January 26, 1999, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case violated the restriction on vehicle operation by a road management authority by loading and operating freight exceeding the gross weight of freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in excess of the total weight of freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business on the road front of a Gun owner’s office 19.8km branch office.
2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on October 28, 2010 that "if an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under Article 83 (1) 2 shall also be imposed on the corporation in violation of the Constitution." Accordingly, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) applied by the public prosecutor to the facts charged in the case of this case is retroactively invalidated pursuant to the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.