beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.26 2017가단5191030

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 50,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 25, 2017 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff was unable to lose her husband due to traffic accidents in the beginning of the 40th century due to CB, and she was unable to neglect her husband, and D is the largest child of the Plaintiff.

B. D and the defendant are the father and wife who reported marriage on March 4, 1994, as the father and wife of the medical school of a household.

The defendant gave birth to D and the E-Date F, G Day H while living a marital life.

C. The Defendant, after having given birth to D and gave birth to H through a third party’s wrongful act, has thoroughly concealed this fact. As a result, D and the Plaintiff knew that H were not a child of D through a genetic test around October 2016, even before they revealed that H was not a child of D.

The defendant, as a medical specialist, did not work in the house and childcare from the beginning of marriage on the ground that the hospital work was difficult.

Therefore, even though the plaintiff lives far away from the place where the defendant resides, he/she may commission the defendant's house and childcare work together with the helper who helps the house work.

The trial was conducted.

E. The defendant inevitably accepted the plaintiff's efforts to help the defendant's house and child care work, and colored on the math and flag's marking on the math and flag's home, and almost the plaintiff was in charge of a series of activities or ideas on the date of the math or flag's home.

F. Around April 2015, D, working as a scarbian medical specialist at I University's University's University's University Hospital, caused an accident where the Plaintiff had been hospitalized in Busan for a period of two times and was hospitalized in Busan, the Defendant did not go to a single-scarb, even though the Plaintiff was staying in Busan, and the Defendant did not go to a single-scarb. The Plaintiff and the Defendant did not come to the house when the Plaintiff and the F were f to enter the house, even though the Plaintiff was reported by the Plaintiff, who was flus, but was fluscing about the flus, and told him to criticize D, and the Plaintiff was suffering from the Plaintiff.