If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is the representative director of C (the city) who constructed Busan Southern-gu B apartment, and the victim D (the South and the age of 41) is the head of E with the office of E and is exercising the right of retention on the above apartment.

At around 08:00 on December 8, 2019, the Defendant arbitrarily removed 1,750,000 won, including one signboard (4,900m x 2,000m x 2,00m x 2,00m m) printed on the victim’s “Scarrac (F)” at the top of the upper end by using the tool to remove and damage 1,750,000 won, which is the sum of the signboards (1,50m x 2,00m x 2,00m m) installed on both the entrance columns of the entrance and exit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written estimate for an investigation report, and a report on the investigation (Attachment of a field photograph);

1. Application of the standard subcontract agreement for construction works, and the statutes governing field photographs at the time of crimes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;