The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below's determination that all of the facts charged in this case is guilty is just and there is no error of law such as misconception of facts contrary to the rules of logic and experience and free evaluation of evidence.

In this case, the court below's appointment of a public defender could not be said to have infringed on the right to receive counsel's assistance, even if the court below did not appoint a public defender to the defendant.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.