However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 11, 2019, around 00:34, the Defendant reported 112 that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and was asked questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the head of the police box affiliated with the police box of the Seodaemun-gu Police Station, which called “C” in front of 00:34 on August 11, 2019, and called “C”, “I am under the influence of the police”, and continuously read “I am under the influence of the police, who is in the face of the police.” On one occasion, I am under the face of E in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted E and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report and patrol duty by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that he/she commits an error and the fact that he/she commits an assault);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (the same previous and multiple violence units);