2. The fact that the judgment defendant led to the confession and reflects the crime of this case, and that the amount of defraudation by the crime of this case is not much high is a circumstance that can be considered favorable to the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment for fraud and committed the fraud of this case again without being aware of it during the repeated crime period after having been sentenced to punishment for fraud, that the Defendant did not make any effort to recover the damage of the victim, and that other various sentencing conditions in the pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., the Defendant’s assertion is not accepted as being too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.