모욕
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. On July 24, 2018, at around 02:05, the Defendant, on the front of Pyeongtaek-si, filed a report of transfer violence, and went on the police headlights of police officers D, who belong to the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station Police Station, dispatched to the scene, and thereby obstructing the Defendant’s driving, and the Defendant gets off the trial cost, and made a public insult of the victim by speaking the victim as “the victim’s few” at the location where the Defendant’s day-to-day E is located.
2. The offense of insult is an offense in which a person’s external reputation is protected by the law, which means a social evaluation of a person’s value. The offense of insult refers to an expression of an abstract judgment or satisfic sentiment that may undermine a person’s social evaluation without mentioning a fact.
Therefore, if any expression is not likely to undermine the social evaluation of the other party’s personal value, such expression was expressed in a somewhat intangible manner.
Even if this does not constitute the elements of insult, it cannot be deemed as constituting the crime of insult.
(대법원 2015. 9. 10. 선고 2015도2229 판결 등). 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인이 위 공소사실 기재 일시, 장소에서 위 공소사실 기재와 같이 피고인의 일행인 E이 있는 자리에서 경찰 D에게 “이놈의 새끼야”라고 큰 소리로 말한 사실은 인정되나, 피고인이 위와 같은 말을 하게 된 경위를 살펴보면, 피고인은 경찰차 전조등으로 인해 운전에 방해를 받고서 위 경찰 D(고소인)에게 “매너 좀 지킵시다”라고 말하는 등 항의하였고, 이에 피고인보다 17살 어린 고소인이 피고인에게 삿대질을 하게 되었으며, 이에 피고인이 화가 나서 고소인에게 “이놈의 새끼야”라고 말하였는바, 피고인의 위와 같은 말은 자신보다 나이가 훨씬 적은 고소인의 삿대질에 대한 반발을...