beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.07.26 2017나315923

건물명도

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The part to be removed or added is that “each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”)” in the second 8th page of the judgment of the court of first instance is considered to be “the instant real estate”.

The second sentence 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is regarded as "the first instance court".

The following matters shall be added after the third two pages of the judgment of the first instance:

[On the other hand, the defendant alleged that he did not reside in the real estate of this case since he did not occupy it after March 2014. Thus, the defendant recognized that he occupied the real estate of this case from the first instance to March 15, 2017 (the preparatory documents and the seventh date for pleading August 25, 2017). The assertion that he did not occupy the real estate of this case after March 2014 seems to the purport that the confession of this case was revoked, but the testimony of the witness E from the second and third evidence and the witness E from the trial of this case is insufficient to view that the confession of this case goes against the truth and due to mistake (the testimony of the witness from the court of first instance is difficult to see that the F, who was only the neighbor of the plaintiff, was unaware of the fact that the defendant did not return to it after leaving the real estate of this case on or before March 3, 2014, and it is difficult to see that the confession of this case as a witness from the court of first instance and the witness status of this case as a witness.

[."3. The defendant's decision as to the defense is deleted from the fourth to the fifth second sentence of the judgment of the first instance, which is written between the fourth to the fifth one, and the fifth to the fifth to the fifth to the fifth to the third to the second to the second.

3. Conclusion.