When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the office of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim C; (b) on June 19, 2014, the Defendant paid a debt of KRW 40 million to the business partner at the time; (c) on the ground that there was a sudden demand for the refund of KRW 60 million to the business partner; and (d) even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, he/she did not have an intention or ability to repay the loan, and (e) on the ground that he/she did not have an intention or ability to repay the loan, the Defendant received KRW 5.5 million from the victim until August 30, 2013; and (d) on the same place on June 19, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 2.5 million from the victim on the same day as “on the other hand, he/she would lend KRW 2.5 million to the victim at the same time until July 25, 2014.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation, copy of a loan certificate, and details of banking transactions;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;