The defendant of "2013 Highest 7643" shall be the chairperson of the Promotion Committee for the Establishment of D C C C C C C C in Incheon Reinforcement-gun.

On February 27, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement stating that, at the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hospital located in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 500 copies of the subscription certificate to the victim E, the Defendant would pay within one month the amount of interest and pay 500 copies of the monthly interest if he/she lends 30 million won to the victim E as he/she is required to operate D D, and as he/she is required to pay the Charnel Business Fund. And as a security therefor, the Defendant provided 50 copies of the subscription certificate as security to the complainant.

However, there is no value of collateral because the certificate of subscription does not indicate the right to use a charnel, but it cannot be distributed and commercialized. Since the smooth progress of the business of establishing a charnel was in an unsound state, as well as the defendant was in bad credit standing, there was no intention or ability to repay it even if borrowed from the complainant.

The Defendant received 30 million won from the victim, namely, the money borrowed from the seat.

"2014 Highest 1282"

1. On July 30, 2007, around July 30, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, would be able to make a charnel house in H Mu Park, and the construction would be completed and gain a big profit. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million to the victim G, the Defendant would pay interest at 100 million after the three-month period.”

However, this case’s charnel Corporation was in a state of being suspended due to the lack of investment funds. Since 2006, the Defendant became bad credit holders and had no other property. The Defendant was responsible for the liability of KRW 3.5 billion borrowed from others while running a charnel business, and invested in the other memorial parks located in the other two locations at the time, and the Defendant received money from the victims.