When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: “C operates D in Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S.C.; “A contract is paid 100 million won after receiving a contract related to D with E and new vehicles.” As the payment of a fine is required, the Defendant deceivings the victim, by borrowing KRW 8 million from a contract for a contract for a contract for a contract, and by deceiving him/her.”

However, even though the defendant did not operate D and did not have any intent or ability to repay the money to the victim due to the lack of money received from E, he received 8 million won from the injured party to his F (G) account and received 8 million won from the injured party and received financial benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Account Number of a suspect);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;