2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On April 16, 2017, the Plaintiff, while driving a B K5 car and staying at around 18:13, caused a traffic accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) that shocks the victim’s left-hand elbow part of the victim, coming up in the same direction by using the right edge of the road, while driving the C-B road to the public health clinic at the right edge of the reservoir.

B. On May 8, 2017, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (class 1 ordinary and class 2 ordinary) (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff caused the instant accident and did not take necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the victims, even though having injured the victims.

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition, but the said claim was dismissed on June 26, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff did not recognize the occurrence of the accident of this case at the time, and therefore did not have the intention of escape.

B) The victim’s injury cannot be assessed as “injury” under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act is nothing more than annoyed person. 2) The Plaintiff did not recognize the occurrence of the instant accident. Considering the fact that the Plaintiff’s driver’s license is essential to maintain the livelihood and work, the instant disposition is deemed to be an abuse of discretion.

B. Determination 1) In full view of the written evidence Nos. 3 and 6 evidence Nos. 1 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff opened and operated a window for a car driven at the time; ② the instant accident was shocked to the extent of having to come to contact with the said vehicle; and immediately after the occurrence of the accident, the Plaintiff’s husband was able to come to dives. ③